一种新的基于双前沿面的交叉效率方法及其应用

本文将双前沿面效率评价的思想引入到传统交叉效率模型中，同时，针对双前沿面交叉效率方法中仁慈型和激进型交叉效率策略无法抉择，以及这两种交叉效率策略的应用范围有限的不足，提出了一种新的基于双前沿面的交叉效率方法。该方法的基本思想是选取一个理想决策单元和负理想决策单元，使用被评价决策单元的权重来计算理想决策单元和负理想决策单元的效率，并使被评价决策单元的效率尽可能接近理想解的效率，同时，尽可能远离负理想解的效率。根据该思想，分别在乐观前沿面和悲观前沿面下求解交叉效率值并进行集结，避免了由于前沿面的选择不同导致的差异以及决策者对仁慈型和激进型交叉效率策略进行抉择的困难。最后，将本文方法与现有方法进行对比分析，并将本文方法应用于我国东部地区10个省(直辖市)的创新效率评价中，以验证方法的有效性。     

基于交叉效率和合作博弈的决策单元排序方法

在数据包络分析中，大量的交叉效率模型已被提出。然而选择不同的目标模型将实现不一样的交叉效率评价。本文基于针对单个决策单元实施的对抗型和仁慈型两个交叉效率模型，用合作博弈方法来研究交叉效率模型的选取，并利用Shapley值对决策单元进行排序。最后通过实例分析显示该排序方法充分利用了最小交叉效率和最大交叉效率的信息完全排序了所有决策单元，具有一定的综合性和合理性。     

基于交叉评价策略的DEA全局协调相对效率排序模型

在DEA(数据包络分析)研究领域,建构在交叉效率概念基础上的现有决策单元排序方法仅以定义的方式给出了用于决策单元排序的交叉效率评价值。对于这种方法构建方式,分别基于管理学的效率概念和多属性决策理论,分析指出其中的交叉效率评价值从本质上讲既与效率的管理学概念不符,也与决策单元的优劣不存在理性逻辑联系。为克服现有决策单元排序方法所存在的上述问题,基于交叉评价策略和效率的管理学概念内涵给出了DEA全局协调相对效率的新概念,在此基础上利用优化理论给出了可以用于决策单元优劣排序的DEA全局协调相对效率测度模型,并通过理论分析和数值案例验证解释了该模型相对于现有决策单元排序方法所拥有的比较优势。     

矩阵型网络DEA模型及其实证检验

针对传统DEA模型无法有效的评价矩阵型网络系统的效率,本文构建了矩阵型网络决策单元的生产可能集,建立了矩阵型网络DEA模型。在此基础上证明了决策单元在矩阵型网络DEA模型下为弱DEA有效的充分必要条件为其每个子系统均为弱DEA有效。最后,选用美国的十个电力公司作为决策单元对模型进行实证检验,得出结论:矩阵型网络DEA模型弥补了传统DEA模型无法反映内部有效性从而可能得到错误结果的缺陷,并能精确地计算出各个子过程的效率,辨识出具体需要改进的子过程。同时新模型为评价复杂系统的效率提供了新的思路。     

基于完全包络面的DEA Super效率评价方法

为了对决策单元进行公平、合理、完全的排序,提出一种考虑完全包络面的DEA Super效率评价方法.讨论包络面的选取与DEA效率值的关系,提出完全包络面的概念,并在等产出图上演示了最优前沿面、最劣前沿面与完全包络面的区别和关系;提出基于最劣前沿面的Super效率DEA模型,给出基于完全包络面的DEA Super效率评价排序模型,目标函数包含决策单元的最优效率和最劣效率两部分.该方法用于决策单元的排序,同时考虑最符合与最不符合决策单元自身偏好的权重体系;该方法用于决策单元的效率排序,能获得比较合理的排序结果,可以实际应用于各种决策单元排序中.     

存在保证域的模糊超效率DEA模型

模糊DEA模型是用于解决存在模糊数据的决策单元(DMUs)效率评价问题的,然而现有的模糊DEA模型分辨率低,本文构建了存在保证域的模糊超效率DEA模型,并给出了一种基于截集的求解方法并进行了证明,该模型有效地解决了输入和输出全部或部分为模糊数的决策单元全排序问题。最后给出了一个银行效率评价的实例说明了方法的有效性。     

基于优势前沿面的非营利组织管理有效性再评价方法

通常认为模糊DEA评价是用于测度管理有效性的一种方法,但是实际运行中由于有些模糊DEA有效单元信息贫乏,导致评价结果难以令人信服.本文提出的基于优势生产前沿面的DEA有效单元再评价方法克服了传统评价的问题,更有效地反映了评价单元的管理进步效果,经过理论分析和实践检验,是目前用于管理有效性评价的最佳方法之一.其特性表现在,将优势前沿面方法应用在非营利组织的测评管理中,通过构造有效性更强的新决策单元实现对DEA有效单元的区分和排序,克服了原来使用的靠DEA基于权重和判断准则进行再评价的缺点,具有现实可行性和有效性,评价结果具有较好的稳定性和可比性,能够对模糊DEA有效单元进行有效区分.研究使管理有效性方法在非营利组织评价中的应用更加具有理论意义和实际价值.     

两阶段生产系统的DEA效率评价模型

数据包络分析(DEA)作为一种数学规划方法,已经被广泛用来评价一个决策单元相对于其它决策单元的效率。经典的DEA模型把决策单元看作一个“黑箱”,对决策单元的内部运行机制不作深入的研究。本文以一个两阶段生产系统为例,从生产系统的内部过程出发,提出一个基于DEA的模型以合理评估该决策单元的相对效率。本文提出的模型实质上是一类特殊的网络DEA模型,其评价原理有别于已有的研究成果,但确实有助于管理者确定生产过程(如供应链)的非有效来源及其效率改进方向。     

存在保证域的模糊非径向偏好DEA模型——基于中科院24个研究所的实证分析

数据包络分析（DEA）是一种非参数化的方法,用于评价具有类似输入和输出的决策单元的效率。传统的非径向DEA模型假设输入和输出数据均为准确值,且对权重变量不加以限制,本文构建了存在保证域的模糊非径向偏好DEA模型,并给出了一种基于模糊数截集的模型求解方法,有效地解决了输入和输出全部或部分为模糊数的决策单元评价问题。最后给出了一个中科院研究所效率评价的实例说明了方法的有效性。     

L-R型区间DEA模型及其变换

本文探讨了评价指标为IR型区间数时,决策单元的相对有效性评价问题,提出了I-R型区间DEA模型.相对一般DEA方法,该模型具有计算简单、适用性广、经济含义明确等特点.     

基于证据推理和前景理论的交叉效率排序方法研究

针对由交叉效率评价策略和交叉效率集结方法的多样性而造成评价结果不一致的问题,提出利用证据推理方法和前景理论,综合各个交叉效率评价策略的评价结果,实现对决策单元的统一评价。首先,分别将选用的交叉效率评价策略以及各个评价策略中的他评效率设置成一级指标和二级指标,依据算数平均和前景理论分别确定一、二级指标的权重;其次,依据他评效率确定二级指标置信度,利用证据推理方法将各个交叉效率评价策略的他评效率综合转换成决策单元被评价为有效的置信度。决策者可通过比较决策单元被识别为有效的置信度的大小来判断决策单元交叉效率的大小,进而实现对决策单元的排序;最后,通过案例验证和说明本文提出方法的有效性和实用性。     

The use of OWA operator weights for cross-efficiency aggregation

Cross-efficiency evaluation is an effective way of ranking decision making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). Existing approaches for cross-efficiency evaluation are mainly focused on the calculation of cross-efficiency matrix, but pay little attention to the aggregation of the efficiencies in the cross-efficiency matrix. The most widely used approach is to aggregate the efficiencies in each row or column in the cross-efficiency matrix with equal weights into an average cross-efficiency score for each DMU and view it as the overall performance measurement of the DMU. This paper focuses on the aggregation process of the efficiencies in the cross-efficiency matrix and proposes the use of ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operator weights for cross-efficiency aggregation. The use of OWA operator weights for cross-efficiency aggregation allows the decision maker (DM)’s optimism level towards the best relative efficiencies, characterized by an orness degree, to be taken into consideration in the final overall efficiency assessment and particularly in the selection of the best DMU.     

DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings

A number of studies have used data envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate the performance of the countries in Olympic games. While competition exists among the countries in Olympic games/rankings, all these DEA studies do not model competition among peer decision making units (DMUs) or countries. These DEA studies find a set of weights/multipliers that keep the efficiency scores of all DMUs at or below unity. Although cross efficiency goes a further step by providing an efficiency measure in terms of the best multiplier bundle for the unit and all the other DMUs, it is not always unique. This paper presents a new and modified DEA game cross-efficiency model where each DMU is viewed as a competitor via non-cooperative game. For each competing DMU, a multiplier bundle is determined that optimizes the efficiency score for that DMU, with the additional constraint that the resulting score should be at or above that DMU 's estimated best performance. The problem, of course, arises that we will not know this best performance score for the DMU under evaluation until the best performances of all other DMUs are known. To combat this “chicken and egg” phenomenon, an iterative approach leading to the Nash equilibrium is presented. The current paper provides a modified variable returns to scale (VRS) model that yields non-negative cross-efficiency scores. The approach is applied to the last six Summer Olympic Games. Our results may indicate that our game cross-efficiency model implicitly incorporates the relative importance of gold, silver and bronze medals without the need for specifying the exact assurance regions.     

Konsensuale Effizenzbewertung und -verbesserung mittels DEA

This contribution is a new DEA approach in as much as it permits the decision making units (DMUs) to improve their respective efficiencies from the view of a peer rather than form their own self-appraisal attitudes. These authors study the output oriented model under constant scale efficiencies and first develop how a DMU can improve its performance by radial output increase or even by free output variation??in the light of the weight system of an arbitrary peer. The results are an improved cross-efficiency matrix and a maximum cross-efficiency matrix. Either of these matrices may serve as an appropriate instrument for a consensual choice of a peer??consensual among all DMUs. Input oriented models as well as simultaneous input/output considerations amend the so far developed results. A suitable example demonstrates all aspects of the new approach.     

Exploiting value system multiplicity and preference voting for robust ranking

Under a data envelopment analysis (DEA) framework, full ranking of a group of decision making units (DMUs) can be carried out through an adequate amalgamation of the cross-efficiency (CE henceforth) scores produced for each DMU. In this paper, we propose a ranking procedure that is based on amalgamating the weight profiles selected over the cross-evaluation rather than related CE scores. The new approach builds, for each DMU, a collective weight profile (CWP henceforth) by exploiting the preference voting system embedded within the matrix of weights, which views the assessing DMUs as voters and the input/output factors as candidates. The occurrence of zero votes is discussed as a special case and a two-level aggregation procedure is developed. The CWPs that are produced extend the concept of collective appreciation to the input/output factors of each DMU so that group dynamics is truly reflected, mainly in decision making circumstances where factor prioritization is necessary for making choices or allocating resources. The robustness of the proposed ranking approach is evaluated with three examples drawn from the literature.     

基于交叉效率DEA与群体共识的区间乘性语言偏好关系群决策

针对区间乘性语言偏好关系群决策问题，提出了一种基于交叉效率DEA和群体共识的群决策方法。首先，提出乘性语言偏好关系导出函数的定义，并构建产出导向的DEA模型，证明了一致性乘性语言偏好关系的DEA效率得分与排序向量之间存在比例关系。在此基础上，建立基于理想值的交叉效率DEA模型，提出乘性语言偏好关系的通用排序方法。同时，基于群体共识建立目标规划模型来计算各语言偏好关系的权重系数。最后，利用Monte Carlo随机模拟的方法对群体语言偏好空间进行统计分析，得到群决策期望排序向量及其可信度。算例分析表明本文方法能够有效的避免信息损失，具有较强的适用性和较高的可信度。     

Additive slacks-based measure: Computational strategy and extension to network DEA

The current paper visits a set of data envelopment analysis (DEA) models that identify inefficiency by optimizing input and output slacks. These slacks are aggregated either in an additive or ratio form. Only the ratio slacks-based DEA models can be solved as a linear program and generate a DEA score between zero and unity. The additive slacks-based model can be equivalent to the Russell graph measure and converted into a second order cone programming (SOCP) problem whose solving procedure has become a mature technology. As such, the additive slacks-based model can also yield a DEA score between zero and unity. This study shows that the additive slacks-based model can be applied to modelling network DEA where the internal structures of decision making units (DMUs) are of interest. The additive slacks-based network DEA can be solved using SOCP technique and adapted to the preference of the decision maker by choosing the weights for aggregating individual components in the network structures. It is shown that the additive slacks-based approach can yield divisional efficiencies of Pareto optimal equivalences to be selected by the decision maker when compared to the existing ratio slacks-based measure. An example and solving codes are provided in the current study.     

DEA博弈模型的分析与发展

数据包络分析(Data Envelopment Analysis,DEA)与博弈论之间关系密切.传统DEA模型忽略了决策单元(Decision Making Units,DMUs)之间的竞合关系,对权重的限制过于宽松,难以合理评价DMU效率值.为此,将博弈论方法引入至DEA模型,开展DEA的博弈研究,既是对DEA理论的重大发展,也将极大拓宽博弈论的应用研究.本文分三个阶段对现有的DEA博弈研究进行述评:(1)DEA的博弈论解释;(2)DEA Game模型及其应用;(3)DEA效率博弈;在深入分析重点模型基础上,总结其发展脉络,促进DEA理论与实践的发展.