一种新的基于双前沿面的交叉效率方法及其应用

本文将双前沿面效率评价的思想引入到传统交叉效率模型中，同时，针对双前沿面交叉效率方法中仁慈型和激进型交叉效率策略无法抉择，以及这两种交叉效率策略的应用范围有限的不足，提出了一种新的基于双前沿面的交叉效率方法。该方法的基本思想是选取一个理想决策单元和负理想决策单元，使用被评价决策单元的权重来计算理想决策单元和负理想决策单元的效率，并使被评价决策单元的效率尽可能接近理想解的效率，同时，尽可能远离负理想解的效率。根据该思想，分别在乐观前沿面和悲观前沿面下求解交叉效率值并进行集结，避免了由于前沿面的选择不同导致的差异以及决策者对仁慈型和激进型交叉效率策略进行抉择的困难。最后，将本文方法与现有方法进行对比分析，并将本文方法应用于我国东部地区10个省(直辖市)的创新效率评价中，以验证方法的有效性。     

基于证据推理和前景理论的交叉效率排序方法研究

针对由交叉效率评价策略和交叉效率集结方法的多样性而造成评价结果不一致的问题,提出利用证据推理方法和前景理论,综合各个交叉效率评价策略的评价结果,实现对决策单元的统一评价。首先,分别将选用的交叉效率评价策略以及各个评价策略中的他评效率设置成一级指标和二级指标,依据算数平均和前景理论分别确定一、二级指标的权重;其次,依据他评效率确定二级指标置信度,利用证据推理方法将各个交叉效率评价策略的他评效率综合转换成决策单元被评价为有效的置信度。决策者可通过比较决策单元被识别为有效的置信度的大小来判断决策单元交叉效率的大小,进而实现对决策单元的排序;最后,通过案例验证和说明本文提出方法的有效性和实用性。     

Exploiting value system multiplicity and preference voting for robust ranking

Under a data envelopment analysis (DEA) framework, full ranking of a group of decision making units (DMUs) can be carried out through an adequate amalgamation of the cross-efficiency (CE henceforth) scores produced for each DMU. In this paper, we propose a ranking procedure that is based on amalgamating the weight profiles selected over the cross-evaluation rather than related CE scores. The new approach builds, for each DMU, a collective weight profile (CWP henceforth) by exploiting the preference voting system embedded within the matrix of weights, which views the assessing DMUs as voters and the input/output factors as candidates. The occurrence of zero votes is discussed as a special case and a two-level aggregation procedure is developed. The CWPs that are produced extend the concept of collective appreciation to the input/output factors of each DMU so that group dynamics is truly reflected, mainly in decision making circumstances where factor prioritization is necessary for making choices or allocating resources. The robustness of the proposed ranking approach is evaluated with three examples drawn from the literature.     

基于交叉效率和合作博弈的决策单元排序方法

在数据包络分析中，大量的交叉效率模型已被提出。然而选择不同的目标模型将实现不一样的交叉效率评价。本文基于针对单个决策单元实施的对抗型和仁慈型两个交叉效率模型，用合作博弈方法来研究交叉效率模型的选取，并利用Shapley值对决策单元进行排序。最后通过实例分析显示该排序方法充分利用了最小交叉效率和最大交叉效率的信息完全排序了所有决策单元，具有一定的综合性和合理性。     

DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings

A number of studies have used data envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate the performance of the countries in Olympic games. While competition exists among the countries in Olympic games/rankings, all these DEA studies do not model competition among peer decision making units (DMUs) or countries. These DEA studies find a set of weights/multipliers that keep the efficiency scores of all DMUs at or below unity. Although cross efficiency goes a further step by providing an efficiency measure in terms of the best multiplier bundle for the unit and all the other DMUs, it is not always unique. This paper presents a new and modified DEA game cross-efficiency model where each DMU is viewed as a competitor via non-cooperative game. For each competing DMU, a multiplier bundle is determined that optimizes the efficiency score for that DMU, with the additional constraint that the resulting score should be at or above that DMU 's estimated best performance. The problem, of course, arises that we will not know this best performance score for the DMU under evaluation until the best performances of all other DMUs are known. To combat this “chicken and egg” phenomenon, an iterative approach leading to the Nash equilibrium is presented. The current paper provides a modified variable returns to scale (VRS) model that yields non-negative cross-efficiency scores. The approach is applied to the last six Summer Olympic Games. Our results may indicate that our game cross-efficiency model implicitly incorporates the relative importance of gold, silver and bronze medals without the need for specifying the exact assurance regions.     

Konsensuale Effizenzbewertung und -verbesserung mittels DEA

This contribution is a new DEA approach in as much as it permits the decision making units (DMUs) to improve their respective efficiencies from the view of a peer rather than form their own self-appraisal attitudes. These authors study the output oriented model under constant scale efficiencies and first develop how a DMU can improve its performance by radial output increase or even by free output variation??in the light of the weight system of an arbitrary peer. The results are an improved cross-efficiency matrix and a maximum cross-efficiency matrix. Either of these matrices may serve as an appropriate instrument for a consensual choice of a peer??consensual among all DMUs. Input oriented models as well as simultaneous input/output considerations amend the so far developed results. A suitable example demonstrates all aspects of the new approach.     

Multi-period efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis: The case of Taiwanese commercial banks

In measuring the overall efficiency of a set of decision making units (DMUs) in a time span covering multiple periods, the conventional approach is to use the aggregate data of the multiple periods via a data envelopment analysis (DEA) technique, ignoring the specific situation of each period. This paper proposes using a relational network model to take the operations of individual periods into account in measuring efficiencies. The overall and period efficiencies of a DMU can be calculated at the same time. Notably, the overall efficiency is a weighted average of the period efficiencies, and the weights are the most favorable ones for the DMU being evaluated. This model, together with two existing ones, is applied to measure the efficiency of 22 Taiwanese commercial banks for the period of 2009–2011. The three-year multi-period analysis shows that the proposed model is more discriminative than the existing ones in ranking the performance of the banks. The period efficiencies for the three years increased steadily, indicating that the performances of the Taiwanese banks examined in this work were improving over this period.     

中立型两阶段交叉效率评价方法

在数据包络分析中，已有的两阶段交叉效率评价方法，不仅只能用于基本两阶段网络结构，而且没有中立地分解子阶段效率。文章提出了一个既适用于基本两阶段网络结构，又适用于具有共享输入的两阶段网络结构的，中立型交叉效率评价方法。该方法定义自评时整体效率等于子阶段效率的加权和，在自评整体效率最大的前提下，从使各子阶段效率都尽可能大的角度为每个决策单元分别确定一组最优权重，进而通过互评计算决策单元整体和子阶段的最终效率得分。最后，通过两个实例验证了方法的实用、合理、有效。     

基于区间灰色不确定语言的多准则决策方法

定义了区间灰色不确定语言及其运算法则和距离公式。拓展了连续区间数据的OWA(C-OWA)算子,提出了基于区间灰色不确定语言的有序加权C-OWA(IGULOWC-OWA)算子,并对其性质进行了分析。针对准则权重已知而方案的准则值为区间灰色不确定语言的多准则决策问题,提出了一种基于IGULOWC-OWA算子的多准则决策方法。该方法通过对各方案在各个准则下的评价值进行转换,将区间灰色不确定语言转化为不确定语言,然后,利用集结算子计算出各个方案的综合准则值,进而得出各方案的排序。最后通过算例表明了方法的可行性和有效性。     

A three-stage hybrid approach for weight assignment in MADM

How to determine weights for attributes is one of the key issues in multiple attribute decision making (MADM). This paper aims to investigate a new approach for determining attribute weights based on a data envelopment analysis (DEA) model without explicit inputs (DEA-WEI) and minimax reference point optimisation. This new approach first considers a set of preliminary weights and the most favourite set of weights for each alternative or decision making unit (DMU) and then aggregates these weight sets to find the best compromise weights for attributes with the interests of all DMUs taken into account fairly and simultaneously. This approach is intended to support the solution of such MADM problems as performance assessment and policy analysis where (a) the preferences of decision makers (DMs) are either unclear and partial or difficult to acquire and (b) there is a need to consider the best "will" of each DMU. Two case studies are conducted to show the property of this new proposed approach and how to use it to determine weights for attributes in practice. The first case is about the assessment of research strengths of EU-28 member countries under certain measures and the second is for analysing the performances of Chinese Project 985 universities, where the weights of the attributes need to be assigned in a fair and unbiased manner.     

基于理想决策单元参照求解策略的DEA交叉效率评价模型

在已有关于DEA交叉效率评价模型中,激进型模型和仁慈型模型会因评价结果不一致而导致实际应用中难以对它们予以抉择的难题;中立型模型虽在形式上规避了前述问题,但其本身存在着理论偏差。针对上述问题,基于TOPSIS的理想点构造方法,提出了一种关于DEA交叉效率评价的新模型,即基于理想决策单元参照求解策略的DEA交叉效率评价模型。该模型不仅具有理论的严谨性,可以规避激进型模型与仁慈型模型之间的选择难题,而且相对于它们而言能够更好地坚持DEA最有利于被评价决策单元的基本思想。数值模拟分析表明新模型具有解决实际问题的较好适用性。     

基于主从博弈的两部门并行系统的效率评价

本文研究了一类典型并行系统的效率评价问题：（1）决策单元由两个并行的子单元组成;（2）在整个系统中,某一子单元居于主导地位,另一子单元居于从属地位;（3）两个子单元之间存在部分共享的投入资源,且无法明显区别该资源在不同子单元之间的分配比例。在分析决策单元整体效率及内部子单元效率的基础上,基于主从博弈思想,提出一种能同时确定系统整体效率及内部子单元效率的评价方法,该方法能够在评价系统效率的同时,实现共享资源的有效分配。最后,采用一个实例分析说明了所提方法的合理性和有效性。     

决策单元交叉效率的自适应群评价方法

传统交叉效率评价方法因决策单元偏好权重不唯一而难以操作,因交叉效率有效性分值平均化集结而难以被接受。目前的学者通常围绕决策单元指标权重的确定性分配方法、交叉效率有效性分值的去平均化集结等分别开展研究。本文将交叉效率评价方法中自评互评相结合的评价模式看作群决策过程,即每个决策单元既是一个被评对象,又是一个决策"专家",提出了一种决策单元交叉效率的自适应群评价方法,将决策单元偏好权重的确定和交叉效率有效性分值的去平均化集结作为同一个决策过程,根据每个决策单元的评价结果与群体评价结果的接近程度,同步迭代调整决策单元的"专家"权重和决策单元自评产生的、并提供给其他被评价决策单元的一组确定的偏好指标权重。实验验证与实例运用分析表明,该方法收敛效果良好,能得到客观稳定的决策单元交叉效率有效性分值及排序。     

Cross efficiency measurement and decomposition in two basic network systems

The data envelopment analysis (DEA) technique uses the most favorable weights for each decision making unit (DMU) to calculate efficiency. The resulting efficiency scores are thus incomparable and difficult to discriminate. This phenomenon is more prominent for network systems, which involves the ranking of the component divisions, in addition to the system. This paper applies the idea of cross evaluation, which has been demonstrated to be an effective approach in ranking DMUs for systems considered as a whole-unit, to measure the efficiency of the two basic structures of network systems, series and parallel. The proposed model is able to decompose the cross efficiency measure of the system into the product of those of the divisions for the series structure and a weighted average for the parallel structure. The results from two real-world cases, one for the basic series structure and another for the parallel one, show that the cross efficiency measures proposed in this paper not only increase the discriminating power in ranking systems and divisions, but also identify the relationship between the system and division efficiencies. Which division has stronger effects on the performance of the system is reflected from this relationship.     

Reducing differences between profiles of weights: A “peer-restricted” cross-efficiency evaluation

This paper deals with the selection of the profiles of weights to be used in cross-efficiency evaluations. In an attempt to prevent unrealistic weighting schemes, one of the issues of main interest that we address here is that of the zero weights, since their use implies that some of the variables considered are excluded from the assessments to be made. In the calculation of cross-efficiency scores, we propose to ignore the profiles of weights of the DMUs that cannot make a choice of non-zero weights among their alternate optima. The different units are therefore assessed in a peer-evaluation that does not consider the profiles of weights of some inefficient DMUs. This approach is referred to as “peer-restricted” cross-efficiency evaluation. Aside from avoiding zero weights, the choice of weights that we make also seeks to reduce the differences between the weights profiles selected as much as possible. Thus, in the “peer-restricted” cross-efficiency evaluation in the present paper we also try to avoid that the different DMUs attach very different weights to the same variable. Finally, we extend this approach to derive a common set of weights by exploiting the idea of similarity between profiles of weights.     

基于三维密度算子的群体DEMATEL指标权重确定方法

针对现有DEMATEL指标权重确定方法大多基于个体决策,且未考虑群体决策评价标度不一致的情况,提出一种新的基于三维密度算子的群体DEMATEL指标权重确定方法。首先,定义了不同评价标度的转换函数,以此将群体DEMATEL矩阵进行一致化处理;其次,给出一种群体DEMATEL矩阵的聚类方法,在此基础上利用三维密度算子对其进行集结;最后,依据DEMATEL方法识别出指标的中心度和原因度,并计算各指标的权重。文末通过一个应用实例验证了所提方法的可行性与有效性。实例结果表明,该方法由于能够较好解决群体决策评价标度不一致的问题,还能够充分考虑群体决策的共识度,因此可使指标权重结果更为客观合理且更为可靠。     

一种新的梯形模糊数互补判断矩阵的排序方法

研究了决策信息以梯形模糊数互补判断矩阵形式给出的有限方案决策问题。首先利用COWA算子,引入期望值函数概念对梯形模糊数来排序,排序结果可以根据决策者的乐观程度进行调节,更加合理。然后基于期望值函数,把梯形模糊数互补判断矩阵转化期望值互补判断矩阵进行排序,并利用决策者的乐观程度对排序结果进行敏感性分析。最后通过算例说明了该方法的可行性和有效性。     

非合作博弈两阶段生产系统的环境效率评价

本文研究了环境效率评价中广泛存在的一类典型问题:两阶段非合作博弈的效率评价问题,该问题有两个明显的特点:(1)决策单元由经济生产子系统和污染物处理子系统两个阶段的子系统构成,(2)经济生产子系统产生的污染物由污染物处理子系统进行处理,且经济生产子系统居于主导地位,而污染物处理子系统居于从属地位.文章在分析各个决策单元整体效率与其子系统效率之间关系的基础上,提出一种能够同时评价决策单元整体效率和其子系统效率的DEA方法;然后引入非合作博弈思想,提出了基于两阶段非合作博弈的环境效率评价的DEA方法;最后采用中国各地区的工业系统的环境效率评价的实例分析说明了该方法的合理性和有效性.由于文章提出的方法能够有效地分析决策单元内部子系统的有效性水平,能够反映子系统之间的主从关系,能够发掘影响决策单元效率的关键因素,因而能够给出更为有效的环境管理信息,为决策者的决策提供科学的依据.     

基于一致性度量的概率模糊语言多属性群决策方法

人们通常习惯用语言术语来表达他们的偏好，因此概率型语言术语集（Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set，PLTS）在决策过程中有着十分重要的作用。目前PLTS的研究刚刚起步，有关PLTS的相关研究没有关注到一致性度量的问题，对于PLTS的多属性群决策方法有待进一步研究。首先，给出了一种新的PLTS的集结方法，并且在已有的PLTS可能度公式的基础上，构建了PLTS的相似度量方法，在此基础上，进一步提出了基于PLTS一致性度量的多属性群决策方法。该方法在各决策者权重未知的情况下，考虑到各决策者之间的一致性。首先，定义PLTS的一致性度量公式，确定决策者权重；并根据PLTS的集结方法，集结各决策者的评价信息；最后，利用可能度公式对PLTS进行排序。通过案例分析验证了该方法的可行性和优越性。     

群决策中基于二元语义的主客观权重集成方法

针对一类属性值和属性权重信息均以语言评价信息形式给出的多属性群决策问题,提出了一种基于二元语义信息处理的主客观属性权重集成方法.首先运用二元语义集成算子计算属性的主观权重,然后给出一种基于最小偏差的属性客观权重计算方法,该方法根据决策者给出的语言决策矩阵计算决策群体对属性判断的偏差,偏差越大,表明决策者对该属性评价意见的分歧越大,则应赋给该属性越小的权重值,以提高群体意见的一致性.在此基础上,对属性的主、客观权重信息进行集成,得到属性综合权重.最后通过算例说明了该方法的有效性和实用性.