当代中国民族地区社会建设的时空境遇与路径

如何加强社会建设,已成为当代中国面临的重大现实课题。认为任何社会发展路径的选择,都离不开对发展所处时空境遇的审慎研判。通过对当代中国社会民族地区建设的宏观境遇与微观境遇分析,提出了当代中国及民族地区社会建设既要求当代中国民族地区必须鲜亮地确立社会建设的价值追求,也要求当代中国民族地区的社会建设要将价值的引领、发展方式的转变、制度机制的保障、民众素质的提升等紧密地结合起来,从而走出富有自身特色的中国民族地区社会建设道路。     

兼并重组影响企业发展机理研究——以湖南省医药行业为例

基于企业与市场环境的动态匹配观点,以湖南省医药行业为实例,探讨企业实施兼并重组的动机与产业选择、企业发展之间的相互关系,推导出湖南省医药行业的兼并重组动机与企业发展的传导模型,并提出相关发展建议。     

论高校马克思主义大众化的路径选择

路径选择是实现高校马克思主义大众化的关键。马克思主义理论课作为大学生思想政治教育的主渠道,在推进高校马克思主义大众化的进程中,居于主导地位。面对当前马克思主义理论课存在的诸多问题,积极优化理论课主导功能的同时,不断探索新的载体路径,是推进大学生思想政治教育工作,实现高校马克思主义大众化的根本所在。     

Using simulation to develop testable functionalist explanations: a case study of church survival

Many arguments for and against functionalism have revolved around logical and methodological issues, discouraging attempts to develop testable functionalist theories. This paper takes a different approach, arguing that the problem with sociological functionalism is not its logic of explanation but the absence of appropriate techniques for formalizing functionalist theories. The solution presented --agent-based simulation --is illustrated by a case study: a functionalist account of church survival. The case study suggests that there is nothing wrong with the logic of functionalism properly formalized, illustrates how simulation can enable testing of functionalist explanations and suggests why existing sociological methods have not proved fruitful for this task. In the light of new techniques like simulation, the current neglect of functionalism may no longer be justified.     

科技行为选择的前瞻性责任伦理

在目前的科技中性论、科技分别论、科技选择论等争论中,"科技选择论"认为科学家对科技行为的选择总是要承担一定的道德责任的,因而该说较为客观.基于此说,我们有必要对科学家提出一种新的责任意识,即以未来行为为导向的前瞻性责任伦理.明确前瞻性责任意识,科学家要有行为选择的自律精神,社会对科学家也要实行道德法制的他律约束,这在新科技环境下具有重要的操作性意义.     

Devolution and Patient Choice: Policy Rhetoric versus Experience in Practice

Background: market reforms in England have been identified as making a clear distinction between English health policy and health policy in the devolved systems in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Patient choice is a high profile policy in the English National Health Service that constitutes significant changes to the demand side of health care. It is not clear what national differences this has led to regarding implementation of policy. This article presents the findings from a large UK‐wide study on the development and implementation of policies related to patient choice of provider. The findings reported here relate specifically to the policy development and organizational implementation of choice in order to examine the impact of devolution on health care policy. Aim: this study examines patient choice of provider across all four countries of the UK to understand the effect of differences in national policies on the organization and service how choice of provider presented to patients. Methods: at the macro‐level, we interviewed policymakers and examined policy and guidance documents to analyze the provenance and determinants of national policy in each UK nation. At the Primary Care Trust or Health Board level, we interviewed a range of public and private health service providers to identify the range of referral pathways and where and when choices might be made. Finally, we interviewed ear, nose and throat, and orthopaedics patients to understand how such choices were experienced. Findings: while we found that distinct rhetorical differences were identifiable at a national policy level, these were less visible at the level of service organization and the way choices were provided to patients. Conclusion: historical similarities in both the structure and operation of health care, coupled with common operational objectives around efficient resource use and waiting times, mediate how strategic policy is implemented and experienced in the devolved nations of the UK.     

公共危机治理中政府决策能力的反思与前瞻

公共危机治理决策是典型的非常态非程序化决策,是检验现代政府决策能力的一个重要标尺.基于对公共危机治理决策之特性及其对政府决策能力之挑战性的研究,审视共和国建立以来公共危机治理政府决策能力嬗变与重构所经历的三个阶段的历史进程,剖析其变迁之得失因由及影响,反思其经验教训,进而探讨改善中国公共危机治理政府决策能力,提升公共危机治理决策效度之路径与对策.     

萨特“承担责任”的思想简析

萨特"承担责任"的思想遭到的误解颇多,如在自由选择与承担责任的关系、个人责任与社会责任的关系、一个人是否应对自己的选择负全责、"承担责任"的思想是否可能成为人们不负责任的借口等问题上都有。对此应根据萨特的原意作细致的辨析,消除误解,还其本来面目。