比较文学研究中"非此即彼"模式的批判

论述比较文学学科自"法国学派"和"美国学派"以来的几次危机及其成因.在以"跨文化研究"为特征的比较文学发展新阶段,西方传统的本质主义的"逻各斯中心主义"仍是比较文学发展的一个重要制约因素,其表现形式--非此即彼的思维方式以各种变体构成对比较文学学科发展的深重的危害.     

新课程实施中教育基本要素优化组合模型研究

在分析教育活动基本要素相互变化规律的教育学和心理学理论依据的基础上,探索建立符合中国新课程改革要求的教育基本要素优化组合模型.对该模型进行解释性分析,指出"交流"是该模型中四要素综合作用的外在体现.最后从教育观念,师生关系两个层面论述了该模型重点部分"交流"的实质性内涵.     

逆防卫的许禁之争及其适用条件分析

原不当侵害人对不当防卫能否进行逆防卫,理论上存在赞成与反对两种观点。当面临生命或重大健康安全时人会本能地反击,这是人性的表面,国外立法和我国正当防卫制度都没有否定原不法侵害人的逆防卫权。着眼于加害与被害的关系,否定逆防卫人的逆防卫权有脱离现实之嫌。但逆防卫毕竟是一种特殊的防卫,如果按正当防卫的一般条件要求逆防卫人,不利于原防卫人权利的保护,因而还必须为其设置一些特殊的限制条件。从逆防卫的特殊性出发,除满足正当防卫的一般条件外,逆防卫的成立还要满足四个条件：一是不当防卫必须严重危及人身安全;二是严重危及人身安全的不当防卫非常紧迫;三是对严重危及人身安全的暴力犯罪不允许进行逆防卫;四是逆防卫人必须履行躲避义务。     

养羊场户饲养规模扩大意愿影响因素分析——基于山东省17地市849家养羊场(户)的调查数据

养羊场(户)扩大饲养规模是提高羊养殖规模化程度的前提。利用山东省17地市849份养羊场(户)的调查数据,运用Logit二元离散选择模型,实证分析了养羊场(户)饲养规模扩大意愿的影响因素。研究结果表明:决策者文化程度、饲养规模、饲养类型、专业化程度、是否加入养羊合作社、是否加入产业化经营组织6个因素对养羊场(户)饲养规模扩大意愿有显著影响。     

感受动词说略

感受动词通过与动作动词相同的形式表示感受义,它既不同于一般的动作动词,也不同于表感受义的形容词.感受动词作为非自主动词的感受义,同动作动词作为自主动词的自主义,二者之间既有联系,又有区别,准确地识别它们往往有赖于具体的语境.     

《甘地自传》中的自我形塑及其成因探究

甘地虽举世知名,其形象却复杂多面,《甘地自传》因而成为探究甘地自我形象的极佳文本。甘地写作自传的缘起和其对自传体裁的选用,都体现出他对自我形象塑造的自觉性。甘地在自传中借不同的人生之“耻”突出了其“世俗之我”的形象,及由此向“圣人之我”形象转变的自传书写策略。此外,这一转变亦具有复杂的宗教、文化、历史等多方面的意义。     

A class of bivariate regression models for discrete and/or continuous responses

ABSTRACT

A general class of models for discrete and/or continuous responses is proposed in which joint distributions are constructed via the conditional approach. It is assumed that the distributions of one response and of the other response given the first one belong to exponential family of distributions. Furthermore, the marginal means are related to the covariates by link functions and a dependency structure between the responses is inserted into the model. Estimation methods, diagnostic analysis and a simulation study considering a Bernoulli-exponential model, a particular case of the class, are presented. Finally, this model is used in a real data set.     

Simple Counterexamples against the Conditionality Principle

The famous theorem of Birnbaum, stating that the likelihood principle follows from the conditionality principle together with the sufficiency principle, has caused much discussion among statisticians. Briefly, many writers dislike the consequences of the likelihood principle (among other things, confidence coefficients and levels of tests are dismissed as meaningless), but at the same time they feel that both the conditionality principle and the sufficiency principle are intuitively obvious. In the present article we give examples to show that the conditionality principle should not be taken to be of universal validity, and we discuss some consequences of these examples.     

The Optimal Allocation Combination for the One-Sided Sequential Screening Procedure Based on the Individual Misclassification Error

In this article, the expected total costs of three kinds of quality cost functions for the one-sided sequential screening procedure based on the individual misclassification error are obtained, where the expected total cost is the sum of the expected cost of inspection, the expected cost of rejection, and the expected cost of quality. The computational formulas for three kinds of expected total costs are derived when k screening variables are allocated into r stages. The optimal allocation combination is determined based on the criterion of minimum expected total cost. At last, we give one example to illustrate the selection of the optimal allocation combination for the sequential screening procedure.     

Bayesian sample‐size determination methods considering both worthwhileness and unpromisingness for exploratory two‐arm randomized clinical trials with binary endpoints

A randomized exploratory clinical trial comparing an experimental treatment with a control treatment on a binary endpoint is often conducted to make a go or no‐go decision. Such an exploratory trial needs to have an adequate sample size such that it will provide convincing evidence that the experimental treatment is either worthwhile or unpromising relative to the control treatment. In this paper, we propose three new sample‐size determination methods for an exploratory trial, which utilize the posterior probabilities calculated from predefined efficacy and inefficacy criteria leading to a declaration of the worthwhileness or unpromisingness of the experimental treatment. Simulation studies, including numerical investigation, showed that all three methods could declare the experimental treatment as worthwhile or unpromising with a high probability when the true response probability of the experimental treatment group is higher or lower, respectively, than that of the control treatment group.