论华莱士1944年访华

美国总统罗斯福为了实现其关于远东和太平洋地区的战略设想，维持战时盟国之间的合作，确立战后以大国合作为基础、以美国为核心的世界新秩序，于1944年6月派副总统华莱士访问中国。华莱士此行的主要目的是调解国共矛盾与中苏关系。这次访问，在一定程度上鼓舞了中国人民的抗战士气，巩固了国共合作统一战线，对二战后期美国的对华政策也产生了重要影响，是抗战时期中美关系史上的一次重要事件。     

The value of experiential approaches to evaluation training

The training of evaluators is an important task—important because of the good that well trained evaluators can do and because of the mischief that poorly trained evaluators can cause. There is broad agreement on the importance of producing evaluators who are methodologically versatile and organizationally savvy. To accomplish these educational ends it is necessary to supplement classroom based instruction with experiential approaches. This paper describes a theoretical model of an effective experiential educational program for training evaluators, assesses two operating programs against the requirements of the model, and reports the results of a quasi-experimental evaluation of the effectiveness of the programs in producing important educational outcomes.     

遥望与背弃：史蒂文斯对叶芝的“苔瑟拉”之反

史蒂文斯的诗歌创作对前辈诗人叶芝的诗作文本既承袭又对抗;他们的诗作和剧作形成互动和互文关系,彰显着后辈诗人对前辈巨作的模仿、反思、逆反、摆脱的再创作过程.     

诗就是力量——论史蒂文斯的诗歌创作取向

华莱士.史蒂文斯是美国现代诗歌史上的巨擘。他致力于以诗歌取代宗教的功能,强调诗歌的力量。他认为诗歌的力量首先在于它能给混乱的现实以美的秩序,而意象和哲理的高度统一是诗歌力量的保障。同时,史蒂文斯非常看重诗歌自身形式的力量,对诗歌的意象、画面、声音甚至语言形式表现出了极大的关注。     

论美国新政"常平仓计划"受王安石经济思想的影响--兼与卜德先生商榷

通过史实的发掘和比较发现 ,大萧条期间华莱士执行的“常平仓计划”的思想原型是王安石变法的青苗法和市易法 ,当时的商品信贷公司和剩余商品救济公司就是根据青苗法和市易法建立的。由此证明 ,卜德认为“常平仓计划”与王安石变法无关的看法是错误的。     

华莱士访华与美国“重返亚洲”

1943年二战战局扭转,美国出于自身全球战略利益的考量将外交政策重心从欧洲转向了亚洲,华莱士访华正是美国“重返亚洲”政策的产物。华莱士访华以经济利益为主导,并对中美战时和战后的经济合作产生了重大的影响,达到了双赢的效果,一方面国民政府获得了梦寐以求的经济军事援助,另一方面美国也收获了一个资源丰富、市场广阔的“小伙伴”作为战后经济发展的“新边疆”。     

华莱士·史蒂文斯《星期天早晨》一诗中的意象

关于《星期天早晨》一诗,评论家向来评论最多的是其宗教主题,却往往忽视了诗歌中丰富多彩的意象。为探讨和再现诗歌中的意象,文章从意象的感受性、矛盾性以及象征性等三方面入手,分析诗人如何通过这些意象使全诗达到“情感统一”、体现诗歌“张力”以及表达作者耽乐的尘世宗教思想。     

华莱士访华及其论中国的前途

1944年6月，华莱士访华，针对当时中国的政治经济状况及其战后发展道路，提出了一系列具有进步主义色彩的观点。华莱士认为，政治建设方面，中国必须重视民主，实行党派合作，走进步政治道路；经济建设方面，中国必须重视民生，以农业改革为基础，由国家主导，在国际社会的帮助下实现现代化；国际政治方面，中国应该发挥大国的作用，成为东亚地区稳定及世界和平与繁荣的基石。     

The impact of general accounting office program evaluations on government

General Accounting Office (GAO) audit reports have an impact on government operations by encouraging growth in the size and scope of the state and by encouraging the Congress and executive agencies to attend to the auditor's dominant values of economy, efficiency, and effectiveness in government. Through its financial, management, and program audits, the GAO program evaluators seek to rationalize agency management and programs so that more resources are required. The GAO's program evaluation efforts also serve Congress by providing for oversight of public policy, a bludgeon to coax agencies into pursuing activities preferred by congressmen, and a tool for electoral activities. In the end, the evaluation auditors are doomed to frustration in achieving their ideals for effective democratic government. This is so because “practical business policy” is irrelevant to government operations and inconsistent with the core values of a democratic state.     

The conduct of program evaluation reviews in the general accounting office

Professional behavior during the General Accounting Office's (GAO's) present era of oversight can best be understood by reviewing the audit types that populate village life in the GAO and the repertoire the office uses in conducting program evaluation audits. Four types of auditors are present, each of which has a role to play in the audit repertoire. This repertoire focuses on finding faults in government programs in order to catch or sustain congressional interest in GAO's work. The “audit trail” of each report may last up to 3 years and involves considerable organizational strife and conflict with outside groups. To sustain themselves through this arduous auditing process, auditors have developed a creed through which they conceptualize themselves as an elite with a mission to insure good government.