民事证据收集权分配问题之思考——以实体正义与程序正义的平衡为视角

受证据裁判主义的影响,证据的质和量会对诉讼的结果产生重大影响.不同诉讼价值观下,民事证据收集制度存在较大差别.对案件实体正义的过分追求会导致在证据收集过程中法院职权作用过强,损及其中立地位,从而影响到程序本身的公正.而过分追求程序正义,排除法官介入证据收集,则可能会损及案件真实的发现,从而影响实体正义的实现.在对民事证据收集权进行分配和规范时,应充分考虑实体正义与程序正义之间的冲突与协调,合理分配不同民事证据收集主体的取证权限和范围,使得民事证据收集权的分配能体现实体正义和程序正义的平衡.

Study of the Right Distribution in Evidence Collection in Civil Law from the Perspective of Substantive Justice and Procedural Justice

As guided by the principle of evidentiary adjudication,the quality and quantity of evidence are of great significance to the litigation process,and in different litigation values,the evidence collection systems are also different: the over-emphasis on substantive justice,which entails possible abuse of the power of the law court in evidence collection,is detrimental to the neutrality of the law court and,consequentially,intervenes with procedural justice; on the other hand,the over-emphasis on procedural ju...