首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

审判独立与抗诉监督制度的完善
引用本文:谢丽琴.审判独立与抗诉监督制度的完善[J].南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2005,7(2):59-63.
作者姓名:谢丽琴
作者单位:常熟理工学院,社会科学部,江苏,常熟,215500
摘    要:司法公正需要审判独立和对审判权实施监督两方面的共同支撑。根据我国的政治体制和司法现状,检察权对审判权的监督必不可少,检察监督与审判独立之间既相互冲突又相互统一。在改造抗诉监督制度时,必须坚持“不损害独立审判权”的底线,把抗诉理由的标准由“确有错误”修改为“认为有错误”,把抗诉范围限定在“损害国家利益和社会公益”的案件和“适用法律错误”的案件,并对抗诉期间和抗诉次数作出严格限制以维护审判结果的终局性和权威性。

关 键 词:审判独立  抗诉  理由  范围  期限
文章编号:1008-603X(2005)02-0059-05
修稿时间:2005年3月25日

On Trial Independence and the Improvement of Prosecutorial Protest System
XIE Li-qin.On Trial Independence and the Improvement of Prosecutorial Protest System[J].Journal of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science),2005,7(2):59-63.
Authors:XIE Li-qin
Abstract:The judicial justice needs the common support of trial independence and the supervision of jurisdiction. According to the political system and judicial status of our country, prosecutorial supervision of the jurisdiction is necessary. Between the prosecutorial supervision and the trial independence, there is not only conflict but also unity. When we reform the prosecutorial protest system, we must stick to the base line that "the supervision can not damage the trial independence". To maintain the judge's finality and authority, it is necessary to amend the standard of the prosecutorial protest reason from "assuredly having mistake" to "possibly having mistake", to restrict the prosecutorial protest scope to the law cases which damage national interests and social public welfare and the law cases which refer to inaccurate law, and to confine the period and times of the prosecutorial protest.
Keywords:trial independence  prosecutorial protest  reason  scope  time limit 
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号