首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

试论儒法对“刑罚”问题之分歧
引用本文:陈冬.试论儒法对“刑罚”问题之分歧[J].华北水利水电学院学报(社会科学版),2009,25(1):124-126.
作者姓名:陈冬
作者单位:华东师范大学,上海,200241  
摘    要:儒家孔孟和法家虽然都正视刑罚对治国治民的作用,但两家的"刑罚"观却存在很大分歧。从三个方面分析儒法两家"刑罚"论存在的分歧,并探讨法家韩非子是如何在抨击儒家"刑罚"论的基础上建立法家绝对的"严刑重罚"论。

关 键 词:儒家  法家  刑罚  治民

A Tentative Approach to the Difference Between Confucian & Legist Outlooks on Penalty
CHEN Dong.A Tentative Approach to the Difference Between Confucian & Legist Outlooks on Penalty[J].Journal of North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power(Social Sciences Edition),2009,25(1):124-126.
Authors:CHEN Dong
Institution:CHEN Dong (East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)
Abstract:Both knowing the importance of penalty in governing a nation and its people, Confucians and Legalists harbor sharply divergent outlooks on penalty. Consisting of three parts, this article analyzes the divergence between the two isms and also discusses how Hanfeizi, the legalist representative, proposed the theory of absolutely cruel penalty on the basis of attacking Confucian penalty theory.
Keywords:Confucian  Legalist  penalty  Governing people
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号