| 关于731部队细菌战诉讼一审判决的批判探讨 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 土屋公献.关于731部队细菌战诉讼一审判决的批判探讨[J].湖南文理学院学报(社会科学版),2002,27(6):12-14. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 土屋公献 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 731部队细菌战被害国家赔偿请求诉讼辩护团 团长、日本律师联合会前会长，[日] |
| |
| 摘 要： | 731部队细菌战诉讼一审判决原告虽为败诉 ,但该判决在事实认定和法律关系方面具有积极意义。法庭在几个法律争议的问题上几乎全面采纳被告方所持论点 ,而对原告方所持法律论点予以驳回 ,对此我们感到强烈不满。一审判决有值得批判之处
|
| 关 键 词： | 731部队 细菌战 诉讼 一审判决 批判 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-489X(2002)06-0012-03 |
A Critical Inquiry into the First Instance Decision of the Lawsuit against Unit 731 of Japanese Army Launching Germ Warfare in China |
| |
| TOYA Koukn.A Critical Inquiry into the First Instance Decision of the Lawsuit against Unit 731 of Japanese Army Launching Germ Warfare in China[J].Journal of Hunan University of Arts and Science:Social Science Edition,2002,27(6):12-14. |
| |
| Authors: | TOYA Koukn |
| |
| Institution: | Former President of Japanese Lawyers Federation |
| |
| Abstract: | In the first instance of the lawsuit against Unit 731 of Japanese (kanto) Army launching germ warfare in China,the prosecutor lost the lawsuit.Although the decision is of some positive meaning as far as the fact affirmation and legal relation are concerned,as to the disputable legal issues,the court accepted almost all arguements of the defendant party and refuted those of the prosecutor party,it is unfair and the decision has much to be criticized. |
| |
| Keywords: | Unit 731 of Japanese Army germ warfare lawsuit first instance decision criticism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
