| “恶法亦法”命题的两面性分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘杨.“恶法亦法”命题的两面性分析[J].沈阳工业大学学报（社会科学版）,2009,2(3):253-258. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘杨 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 辽宁大学 法学院， 沈阳 110136 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 基于简单化理解，分析实证主义法学派始终饱受误解和质疑。与自然法相比，法律实证主义关注的重心发生了“位移”：前者关注的是法律“是”什么的定义问题，而后者关注的是法的实效层面的对策、策略问题。通过对“恶法非法”及与之关联的“恶法亦法”命题的分析，指出自然法学派与法律实证主义法学派的观点都具有两面性，二者的差别应当在认识论、方法论的意义上理解，而不应简单理解为本体论上的对立。就此来说，法律实证主义的考虑可能更为周全、稳妥。
|
| 关 键 词： | 法哲学 自然法 法律实证主义 恶法亦法 恶法非法 本体论 认识论 方法论 |
Analysis of two-sidedness of "an unjust law is still law" thesis |
| |
| LIU Yang.Analysis of two-sidedness of "an unjust law is still law" thesis[J].Journal of Shenyang University of Technology(Social Science Edition),2009,2(3):253-258. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Yang |
| |
| Institution: | Law School, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Due to the simplified comprehension,the legal school of analytical positivism has been misunderstood and queried all the time.Compared with the theory of natural law,legal positivism has changed its focus:the former focuses on the definition that what law is,while the latter emphasizes the measures and tactics of law on actual effect dimension.Through the analysis of the thesis of "an unjust law is not law" and its opposite thesis of "an unjust law is still law",it argues that the viewpoints of natural law ... |
| |
| Keywords: | philosophy of law natural law legal positivism unjust law is still law unjust law is not law ontology epistemology methodology |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《沈阳工业大学学报（社会科学版）》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《沈阳工业大学学报（社会科学版）》下载免费的PDF全文 |
