| 道成肉身与体用一如--基督教与儒家本体论之比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 任强.道成肉身与体用一如--基督教与儒家本体论之比较[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2004,44(3):24-29. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 任强 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中山大学,法学院,广东,广州,510275;北京大学,法学院,北京,100871 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 基督教和儒家都通过抽象的否定完成了本体论的建构.但是,基督教的本体论区分本体与现象,它以神的人格化完成了彼岸对此岸的关照.在儒家的本体论中,本体不离现象,彼岸与此岸不分.基督教的本体论方便救世,儒家的本体论则更加圆融.
|
| 关 键 词： | 基督教 儒家 本体论 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-9639(2004)03-0024-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年11月20 |
"The Word Became Flesh" and "Noumenon and Appearance Is One": A Comparative Study of Ontology Between Christianity and Confucianism |
| |
| REN Qiang."The Word Became Flesh" and "Noumenon and Appearance Is One": A Comparative Study of Ontology Between Christianity and Confucianism[J].Journal of Sun Yatsen University(Social Science Edition),2004,44(3):24-29. |
| |
| Authors: | REN Qiang |
| |
| Abstract: | Both Christianity and Confucianism establish their own ontology by the form of abstract negation. Christianity makes the distinction between noumenon and appearance in its ontology. It can show loving care for the temporality by means of the personifying God in heaven. While in Confucian ontology, noumenon cannot exist without appearance and Faramita cannot be independent of temporality. Christian ontology aims at salvation, while Confucian ontology is more flexible. |
| |
| Keywords: | Christianity Confucianism ontology |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
