首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“底线竞争”抑或“上限竞争”——以美国公司法制度的竞争为视角
引用本文:许家庆.“底线竞争”抑或“上限竞争”——以美国公司法制度的竞争为视角[J].昆明理工大学学报(社会科学),2007,7(3):76-82.
作者姓名:许家庆
作者单位:北京大学法学院 北京
摘    要:19世纪末20世纪初美国各州为了吸引公司注册,在公司法上展开了竞争。这种竞争是"底线竞争"("向下的竞争")抑或"上限竞争"("向上的竞争")一直存在着争议。对于这个问题的回答,关键是要看在公司法的基本矛盾中应当如何取向:一方面,基于平等的主张,保护包括小股东在内的其他利益相关者,防止内部人控制;另一方面,基于效率的主张,促进公司管理者更为便利地行使权力,保证公司创造社会财富。法律的目标在于强调哪个方面?联邦化,抑或地方化?股东保护,抑或包括管理者在内的利益相关者保护?等等。这实质上是法律理念的一个矛盾。

关 键 词:底线竞争  上限竞争  联邦化  利益相关者保护  公司法的竞争
文章编号:1671-1254(2007)03-0076-07
修稿时间:2007年5月18日

Is It "The Race to the Bottom" or "The Race to the Top"
XU Jia-qing.Is It "The Race to the Bottom" or "The Race to the Top"[J].Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences),2007,7(3):76-82.
Authors:XU Jia-qing
Abstract:Competition of corporation law among different States in US commenced for the purpose of attracting registration of corporations locally from the end of the 19th centaury to the early 20th.Is it "the race to the bottom" or "the race to the top"?This has been a controversial issue.The answer to it depends upon the actual value selec- tion with regard to the fundamental contradiction peculiar to corporation law:either to protect stakeholders,including minority shareholders in terms of equality so as to prevent insider control or to facilitate managers to exercise conven- iently their duties in terms of efficiency to ensure the creation of social welfares by corporations;what objectives,inter alia,federation or localization,shareholder protection or other stakeholders protection,including that of managers, and otherwise,deserve to be accentuated by corporation law?It is submitted that this is,in essence,a perplexing contradiction in legal ideas.
Keywords:the race to the bottom  the race to the top  federalization  stakeholder  competition of Corporation Law
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号