首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

《红楼梦》是所谓的"史书"吗? --评霍氏姐弟的《红楼解梦》
引用本文:胡明清.《红楼梦》是所谓的"史书"吗? --评霍氏姐弟的《红楼解梦》[J].渝西学院学报(社会科学版),2003,2(1):42-47.
作者姓名:胡明清
作者单位:渝西学院中文系 重庆永川402168
摘    要:霍氏姐弟的《红楼解梦》前些年轰动一时 ,其最根本的观点是 :《红楼梦》隐写了“一部历史” ,实质上是“一部史书”。霍氏姐弟赖以立论的 ,主要有四大概念———“野史”、“史公”、“《春秋》微词”和“史家曲笔” ,但是他们根本漠视这些概念的文学意蕴 ,对其做了错误的理解。因此 ,《红楼解梦》建立在这些错误理解上的观点是站不住脚的。

关 键 词:《红楼解梦》  野史  史公  《春秋》微词  史家曲笔
文章编号:1671-7546(2003)01-0042-06
修稿时间:2002年6月11日

Is Dream of the Red Chamber a so- called Historical Record?--Review on Huos' Interpretation on Dream of the Red Chamber
Authors:HU Ming-qing
Abstract:Huos' Interpretation on Dream of the Red Chamber made a noise in the world in the past few years. Their basic view is:Dream of the Red Chamber tells implicitly a history and thus is a historical record.Their view is based on four concepts: unofficial history,historiographer, bias words in the Spring and Autumn Annals, and historian's distortion of the facts. However, they totally have a disregard for the literary implication of these concepts and make improper understanding of these concepts. Therefore, built on these false interpretations, their view is untenable.
Keywords:unofficial history  historiographer  bias words  historian's distortion of the facts  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号