《红楼梦》是所谓的"史书"吗? --评霍氏姐弟的《红楼解梦》 |
| |
引用本文: | 胡明清.《红楼梦》是所谓的"史书"吗? --评霍氏姐弟的《红楼解梦》[J].渝西学院学报(社会科学版),2003,2(1):42-47. |
| |
作者姓名: | 胡明清 |
| |
作者单位: | 渝西学院中文系 重庆永川402168 |
| |
摘 要: | 霍氏姐弟的《红楼解梦》前些年轰动一时 ,其最根本的观点是 :《红楼梦》隐写了“一部历史” ,实质上是“一部史书”。霍氏姐弟赖以立论的 ,主要有四大概念———“野史”、“史公”、“《春秋》微词”和“史家曲笔” ,但是他们根本漠视这些概念的文学意蕴 ,对其做了错误的理解。因此 ,《红楼解梦》建立在这些错误理解上的观点是站不住脚的。
|
关 键 词: | 《红楼解梦》 野史 史公 《春秋》微词 史家曲笔 |
文章编号: | 1671-7546(2003)01-0042-06 |
修稿时间: | 2002年6月11日 |
Is Dream of the Red Chamber a so- called Historical Record?--Review on Huos' Interpretation on Dream of the Red Chamber |
| |
Authors: | HU Ming-qing |
| |
Abstract: | Huos' Interpretation on Dream of the Red Chamber made a noise in the world in the past few years. Their basic view is:Dream of the Red Chamber tells implicitly a history and thus is a historical record.Their view is based on four concepts: unofficial history,historiographer, bias words in the Spring and Autumn Annals, and historian's distortion of the facts. However, they totally have a disregard for the literary implication of these concepts and make improper understanding of these concepts. Therefore, built on these false interpretations, their view is untenable. |
| |
Keywords: | unofficial history historiographer bias words historian's distortion of the facts |
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录! |
|