首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

《谈美书简》是“现代中国美学经典”吗——论朱光潜先生《谈美书简》的学理性缺失
引用本文:郑惠生.《谈美书简》是“现代中国美学经典”吗——论朱光潜先生《谈美书简》的学理性缺失[J].汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版),2010,26(2):11-16.
作者姓名:郑惠生
作者单位:汕头职业技术学院人文社科系,广东,汕头,515041
摘    要:对《谈美书简》的学理分析,主要针对其论证过程而不是那些充满着争议的学术观点,也只是举隅而非全面。不过,从中仍能看出该书确实存在着学理性缺失的问题。假如再考虑到它本身所固有的时代局限性,则可知不宜将其当成"现代中国美学经典",更不能称之为"中国美学第一书"。客观地讲,《谈美书简》里有许多地方闪烁着美学思想的火花,也有朱先生对社会对人生的真知灼见,但瑜不掩瑕,其中的不足理当被揭示、厘清。

关 键 词:学术批评  朱光潜  《谈美书简》  美学经典  学理性缺失  逻辑

Query on Letters on Beauty as Classical Text of Modern Chinese Aesthetics:Absence of Academic Doctrines of Letters on Beauty by Zhu Guangqian
ZHENG Hui-sheng.Query on Letters on Beauty as Classical Text of Modern Chinese Aesthetics:Absence of Academic Doctrines of Letters on Beauty by Zhu Guangqian[J].Journal of Shantou University(Humanities Edition),2010,26(2):11-16.
Authors:ZHENG Hui-sheng
Institution:ZHENG Hui-sheng(Department of Humanities , Social Sciences,Shantou Polytechnic,Shantou,Guangdong 515041)
Abstract:The academic analysis of Letters on Beauty is mainly focused on its proving process rather than its controversial academic ideas;in other words,it is exemplifying rather than comprehensive.However,the analysis shows that the book does have the defect doctrinal absence.Furthermore,if the inherent limitations of the times context of the book are considered,it can be deduced that it is inappropriate to say of the book asthe classical text of the modern Chinese aesthetics,even lessthe first book of Chinese aest...
Keywords:academic criticism  doctrinal analysis  Zhu Guangqian  Letters on Beauty  Aesthetic classical text  doctrinal absence  process of proving  logic  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号