| 关于随附性问题 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 柳海涛,殷正坤.关于随附性问题[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2006,23(2):22-25. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 柳海涛 殷正坤 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华中科技大学,哲学系,湖北,武汉,430074 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 当代西方心灵哲学由金在权、戴维森等人提出的随附性范畴虽然规避了强还原论的缺陷,在心物关系的众多理论中貌似一种更为高明的解释,然而不仅其阐述和论证粗糙、模糊,并且也没有真正揭示心灵的本质和实在所指。探索意识的本质首先要符合脑科学研究的经验实证,也要从哲学高度对各种心身关系理论进行整合,统一认知构架。
|
| 关 键 词： | 脑神经科学 实体二元论 物理主义还原论 随附性 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-0598(2006)02-0022-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年11月1日 |
On supervenience |
| |
| LIU Hai-tao,YIN Zheng-kun.On supervenience[J].Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University Social Science Edition,2006,23(2):22-25. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Hai-tao YIN Zheng-kun |
| |
| Abstract: | Although contemporary western physical philosophy avoids the shortcoming of reducibility by supervenience scope which was pointed out by Jin Zaiquan and Davidson and cleverly explains the relationship between mind and material,its narration and discussion is inaccurate and unclear and does not really reveal the essence of mind and material.Exploration of the essence of consciousness should firstly accord with the research experience of brain science and then integrate various relationships between mind and materials to unite recognition frame. |
| |
| Keywords: | brain nerve science substaintive dualism physicalism reducibility supervenience |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
