| 孔子“正名”论的语言学阐释 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴礼权.孔子“正名”论的语言学阐释[J].北华大学学报(社会科学版),2013(1):4-9. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴礼权 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 复旦大学中国语言文学研究所;中国修辞学会 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 孔子的"正名"论,学者们从不同的角度有不同的解读。从语言哲学的角度去观察,我们认为其中涉及三个问题:一是"名"与"实"的关系问题;二是"言"与"事"的关系问题;三是"君子慎言"的问题。从哲学的角度看,孔子关于"名"、"实","事"、"言"关系的观点,都有颠倒主从关系的认识偏颇,但从语言哲学的角度分析,则亦不乏其合理性的内核。至于"君子慎言"的观点,从现代言语行为理论的角度看,则具有时代前瞻性的认识价值,在社会实践中具有较强的指导意义。
|
| 关 键 词： | 正名论 语言学 孔子 哲学 名实 |
Viewing Confucian "Zheng Ming" from a Linguistics Perspective |
| |
| WU Li-quan.Viewing Confucian "Zheng Ming" from a Linguistics Perspective[J].Journal of Beihua University(Social Sciences),2013(1):4-9. |
| |
| Authors: | WU Li-quan |
| |
| Institution: | WU Li-quan(Institute of Chinese Language and Literature,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | There are many diverse opinions from different aspects in Confucian ＂Zheng Ming＂. It arranges in three angles from a philosophy of language standpoint： the relationship between ＂ruing＂ （name） and ＂shi＂ （ nature）, the relationship between ＂yan＂ （speaking） and ＂shi＂ （thing）, and gentleman should hold his tongue. Although he inverted the relationship between ＂ming＂ （name） and ＂shi＂ （ nature ）, ＂yan＂ （ speaking ） and ＂shi＂ （thing） from a philosophy standpoint, his theories do make sense from a philosophy of language standpoint. The view of gentleman holding his tongue not only is far-sighted but also has practical significance. |
| |
| Keywords: | On ＂Zheng Ming＂ Linguistics Confucian Philosophy Name and nature |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
