庄子《天地篇》哲学义解

借由庄子《天地篇》的文义辨析，本文讨论庄子学派的政治哲学思想，并追究其合理性。《天地篇》批判儒家德性政治、法家刑罚政治、名家无谓的诡辩，对历史上的儒家圣王尧、舜、周武都置辞批评，理由是他们并不真正爱民，而是为了自己需求在表演而已，并且同置曾史与桀跖，理由都是失其本性，其所追求就是上位放任，则下民自适，实际上是对现实政治完全无力的立场。本文认为，现实之不堪，各学派所共知，至于追求何种价值，是各家自己的选择，庄子学派无须攻击他家立场，除非找到真正的宇宙规律、历史规律，才能论断高下，但这就要进行各家意旨的正确理解、准确诠释的工作了，完成了这一步，才能真正解决生命的意旨以及政治的根本的大哉问问题。

Philosophical Interpretation of the Article Heaven and Earth in Chuang Tzu

This paper discusses the political philosophy of Zhuangzi School by means of the text interpretation of the article of heaven and earth, and also discusses the rationality of its thinking. The article of heaven and earth,criticizes moral political thinking of Confucianism, punishment political thinking of Legalism School and pointless sophistry of Name School. It also criticizes the historical Sage in Confucian''s tradition, including King Yao, Shun, Yu, Tang, Wen and Wu by the reason of that are not really loving people but doing a show for their own benefit. And it also equals the moral position of the good man Zeng and Shi with the bad guys Jie and Zhi, uses the reason that they all lose their nature. The political opinion of this article suggests that the, king should be laisser-faire and the people out to be at ease. This is, in fact, a completely powerless position against real politics. In the author''s opinion, the shortcomings of the real society had been known by all the schools, the pursuit of what value in each School is the individual choice, and Zhuangzi School does not need to attack other School''s position. Only by finding the laws of the universe and the laws of history can they judge the theory of each School. And this needs the proper understanding and interpretation of the ideas of all the Schools. Only this step is done well, could it really solve the problem of the significance of life and the fundamental question of politics.