首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

我国共犯制度的本体解读及实践困境
引用本文:王志远.我国共犯制度的本体解读及实践困境[J].佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版),2010,28(4):7-12.
作者姓名:王志远
作者单位:吉林大学,法学院,吉林,长春,130012
基金项目:国家社会科学基金资助项目 
摘    要:我国共犯制度以"共犯关系"为核心范畴为参与犯设定了统括式的处罚条件,对参与犯的处罚则采取了"在共同实施的犯罪的刑罚限度之内,根据各共同犯罪人的参与性质及其对于犯罪事实的作用个别化确定各自所应承受的刑罚"的原则。上述处罚条件设定导致了实践中的逻辑困境和刑事政策困境,而上述处罚原则设定也可能因为"共同所犯的罪名难以确定"和"诸参与犯之间主从关系不明"的情况存在而难以贯彻。

关 键 词:共犯关系  主从关系  实践困境

An Interpretation of the Complicity System of China and Its Practical Puzzles
WANG Zhi-yuan.An Interpretation of the Complicity System of China and Its Practical Puzzles[J].Journal of Foshan University(Social Science),2010,28(4):7-12.
Authors:WANG Zhi-yuan
Institution:WANG Zhi-yuan (School of Law, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China)
Abstract:Taking the conjunct relationship as core category, the complicity system of our country creates a whole disciplinal standard for all kinds of participants' illegal activities. As for how to determine the punishment of each participant, the principle from the complicity system of our country is: According to the statutory sentence of the crime that several participants commit, all the participants are classified as principaI and accessary, and their different punishments are thus determined respectively. The whole disciplinal standard mentioned above causes the logical and criminal-policy puzzles. Meanwhile, the punishing principle is hard to implement effectively due to the facts that "the special crime is hard to determine" and "the principal and aceessary are hard to classify".
Keywords:the conjunct relationship  the difference between the principal and accessary  practical puzzles
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号