首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

如何正确理解司马迁的历史通变观
引用本文:杨光熙.如何正确理解司马迁的历史通变观[J].浙江海洋学院学报(人文科学版),2004,21(4):15-17.
作者姓名:杨光熙
作者单位:浙江海洋学院,人文学院,浙江,舟山,316004
摘    要:司马迁的通变历史观在<史记>中似乎自相矛盾.一方面,在理论上,他明确宣扬"循环论",宣扬"三王之道若循环"、五德终始、天运呈周期性变化等内容;而另一方面,由于其宣扬的循环理论之循环周期太长、循环对象无具体内容作参照,因而事实上无法在汉王朝以前的具体的历史撰述中体现出循环,使<史记>所撰述的具体历史内容没能体现出循环.这种理论和实践的"矛盾"使司马迁研究者在理解其历史通变观时产生了分歧.

关 键 词:司马迁  <史记>  通变观  发展观  循环论
文章编号:1008-8318(2004)04-0015-03
修稿时间:2004年10月20

On Simaqian's Variation View of History
YANG Guang-xi.On Simaqian''''s Variation View of History[J].Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University(Humane Science),2004,21(4):15-17.
Authors:YANG Guang-xi
Abstract:Simaqian's variation view of history in his works Shiji (Records of History) seems to be rather self-contradictory. On the one hand, he advocated definitely historicism theoretically, publicizing such views as "the circulation of three king's taoism", the beginning and end of five morals and cyclical movement of heavens. On the other hand, as a matter of fact, he did not embody his theory of circulation in the concrete historical writing before the Han Dynasty because of his too long a period of circulation of his historicism and lack of concrete content as references. As a result, it was impossible for him to show his historicism in the concrete historical content of his works Shiji. This kind of contradiction between theory and practice causes the later researchers of Simaqian to result in different opinions on Simaqian's variation view of history.
Keywords:Simaqian  Shiji  variation view  view of development  historicism
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号