| “合作生产”与廉政建设:合作治理逻辑的延伸 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 戴维·H·罗森布鲁姆,公婷.“合作生产”与廉政建设:合作治理逻辑的延伸[J].广州大学学报(社会科学版),2014(1):5-11. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 戴维·H·罗森布鲁姆 公婷 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]美利坚大学公共事务学院,美国华盛顿20016 [2]香港城市大学公共政策学系,中国香港 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 基金项目：国家社会科学基金重大项目（13＆ZD011） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 20世纪90年代,合作治理已经成为提供社会公共服务的主要手段。合作治理的局限性在于其可能导致腐败新形式的产生以及旧形式的扩大。合作生产则可以通过激励个人反腐来促进廉洁合作治理的公共价值。美国的Qui tam诉讼是以合作治理的逻辑来激励全民参与反腐的一种尝试。
|
| 关 键 词： | 合作生产 Qui Tam 合作治理 腐败 |
Logic of Collaborative Governance and Its Accountability |
| |
| David H. Rosenbloom,Gong Ting.Logic of Collaborative Governance and Its Accountability[J].Journal of Guangzhou University(Social Science Edition),2014(1):5-11. |
| |
| Authors: | David H Rosenbloom Gong Ting |
| |
| Institution: | 1. School of Public Affairs, American University, USA; Department of Public PolicyCity University of Hong Kong ) |
| |
| Abstract: | By the 1990s, collaborative governance had emerged as a major public administrative approach for providing a wide array of public services. A downside to collaborative governance is the potential for increasing cor- ruption in new as well as traditional forms. Government - citizen coproduction can work as a defense against corrup- tion, in light of the logic of collaborative governance, by enlisting contractors, network employees, and the public at large in co- producing ＂clean＂ government. |
| |
| Keywords: | co - production Qui Tam report collaborative governance corruption |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
