基于IT价值模型的企业信息化诊断研究

根据IT价值模型,本文从IT能力、流程绩效、动态能力和企业绩效四个层次构建了企业信息化诊断指标体系。在此基础上,可拓评价方法被用来判断各个指标状态和价值创造各个阶段的综合水平。结合评价结果和IT价值生成路径,企业可以对信息化实施的薄弱环节进行诊断。最后给出了一个具体的算例。     

基于项目的JSP实训课程学习质量评价探索与实践

阐述了JSP实训课程"任务驱动、项目导向"的教学模式改革,构建了与之对应的以"教师、学生、企业"为评价主体、多种评价方式相结合的"三方"式学生学习质量评价模式,通过实例说明了如何运用这种模式来评价学生学习质量,总结了"三方"式评价模式的意义和作用,指出了课题进一步研究的方向。     

基于结构方程模型的经销商低碳行为能力评价

低碳经济背景下,新的经营环境和社会责任给企业的生存与发展带来了重大的影响。经销商作为闭环供应链上的渠道主体,实施低碳行为是实现资源长远利用的必然选择,也是企业能够保持长久竞争优势的重要手段。基于此,在问卷调查的基础上,运用结构方程模型对经销商低碳行为能力进行评价,通过SPSS 13.0和LISREL 8.80等软件处理指标数据,进而完成模型的运行、检验与修正,筛选出有关键作用的影响因素,并针对性地加以改进,为经销商能够长期实现“经济与环境”的综合效益提供理论指导与技术参考。     

基于模糊综合评价法的农民工创业风险评价研究

基于模糊综合评价法,将农民工创业风险分为5个一级指标,20个二级指标,并应用层次分析法确定风险因素指标的权重。研究结果表明,在众多风险因素中,管理风险指数排序第一,是农民工创业过程中的一大隐患;其他主要影响农民工创业风险的指标由高到低排序依次为资源风险、环境风险、市场风险、技术风险;最后,提出农民工创业风险的防范建议。     

生态政绩考评失灵与环保督察——规制地方政府间“共谋”关系的制度改革逻辑

生态环境保护与治理是国家治理的重要内容,常规式治理与运动式治理是解决生态环境治理问题最为常见的两种机制。运动式治理机制因常规式治理机制失灵而启动并通过嵌入性控制来实现组织目标。生态政绩考评试图通过例行的考评机制来引导和调控地方政府及官员的施政行为。这种机制因存在委托-代理风险、央地目标冲突、绩效结果激励约束强度小等问题,容易导致地方政府间的生态环境治理“共谋行为”的产生,亟须可替代性的治理机制来实现可行的和有效的治理。为此,环保督察应运而生并成为调控生态环境治理节奏的显性机制;通过嵌入性控制能够有效遏制生态政绩考评失灵,规制地方政府间的“共谋行为”,实现对地方政府环境治理行为的有效控制。     

生计资产异质性视角下浙江农户宅基地流转后的福利评价与比较徐建军

以浙江宁波、绍兴、嘉兴、湖州等地农户为调查对象,依据农户生计资产分类,就农户宅基地流转后的福利水平进行模糊评价。整体来看,农户经济、居住条件、休闲健康方面的福利水平高于设定的宅基地流转前农户福利的模糊状态,而社会保障、生态环境、发展机会以及心理认同四方面的福利水平在宅基地流转后反而下降了。基于生计资产异质性农户的比较发现,农户经济、居住条件方面均提高了生计资产缺乏型和富裕型农户的福利水平,但降低了这两类农户的社会保障和生态环境方面的福利;不同之处在于,宅基地流转还促进了资产缺乏型农户的休闲健康、发展机遇方面的福利,但降低了其心理认同度,这与宅基地流转对生计资产富裕型农户的影响正好相反。     

‘Keeping families and children in mind’: an evaluation of a web‐based workforce resource

This study outlines pilot evaluation data of the web‐based training resource ‘Keeping Families and Children in Mind’, designed for clinicians who work with families where a parent has a mental illness. The resource was developed from scoping existing workforce packages and in consultation with consumers, carers, researchers and mental‐health clinicians. Preliminary evaluation data were collected from an urban and a rural site in Australia via focus group interviews and pre‐ and post‐training questionnaires to ascertain the experiences of those who participated in the training. Additionally, training facilitators were invited to maintain journals in order to identify planning and implementation issues when using the resource. Post‐training, participants emphasized the need to work collaboratively with others, as well as the importance of acknowledging and working with the family members of consumers, especially children. Also, participants reported positive changes in knowledge, skill and confidence when working with families affected by parental mental illness. Facilitators highlighted technology issues and the need to work interactively with participants when using the resource. Recommendations regarding policy and future research conclude this paper.     

基于一致性的动态组合评价方法研究

为了解决多种动态评价方法和动态组合评价方法评价结论非一致性问题,提出基于一致性的动态组合评价方法。确定相容动态评价方法集,应用几种动态组合评价方法对相容动态评价方法集中的单一动态评价结论进行组合评价,如果评价结论非一致,再利用这几种动态组合评价方法对动态组合评价结论进行组合或再组合,直到得到一致性的动态组合排序值为止。应用基于一致性的动态组合评价方法对东部地区区域自主创新能力进行动态组合评价,得到一致性的评价结论,通过实例说明本研究实际应用上的有效性。基于一致性的动态组合评价方法对解决多种动态评价方法评价结论非一致性问题提供了思路,是综合评价方法研究的有益补充,可以利用该方法进行应用研究。     

“三纲”说的原始要义及其现代评价

传统“三纲”说实有两层意涵,其一是指三种伦理关系,其二是指“君为臣纲,父为子纲,夫为妻纲”。“三纲”包涵了和合一体、主从有别的伦理指向,内蕴了各安其分、一本于义的内在要求。“三纲”作为三种伦理关系,其间存在一种“差序格局”。“三纲”的内在价值在于肯定人伦的重要性,强调人格主体应各安其位、各尽其道。传统儒家伦理对当下的道德建设仍有其启示意义。我们应以同情的态度看待传统文化,对其作出客观、公允的评价,在此基础上发掘其所具有的恒久价值。     

Between Poor Relief and Human Capital Investments – Paradoxes in Hybrid Social Assistance

Conditional cash transfers (CCTs) are often being promoted for their simultaneous advantages of short‐term income protection and long‐term human capital investments. Yet, existing evaluations have largely failed to test the underlying programme theory, and few empirical case studies have explored inherent contradictions and ambiguous consequences of this hybrid approach. To further understand the programmes' social policy implications, this study identifies and analyzes such ambiguities and paradoxical consequences in the case of Uruguay's CCT‐programme, Asignaciones Familiares (AFAM). Drawing on qualitative data from interviews with beneficiaries and members of the commission who designed the programme, this study reveals major paradoxes in AFAM's design and implementation caused by various endogenous factors. Relevant to social policy in general, and CCT‐evaluations in particular, findings also indicate that the hybrid social assistance approach may have perverse effects on the programme's twin objectives.