Leader-member exchange as a linking pin in the idiosyncratic deals - Performance relationship in workgroups

In the current investigation, idiosyncratic deals (i-deals; individualized work arrangements) are modeled as differentiated resources that shape leader-member exchange (LMX) relationships in workgroups. We integrate literature on leader-member exchange (LMX) with research on i-deals to argue that employee evaluations of i-deals received from the grantor –typically the leader- enhance employee perceptions of LMX, which in turn become instrumental in generating positive performance outcomes. Furthermore, because workgroup characteristics have potential implications on the relationship between a deal grantor and the deal recipient, drawing upon social identity theory of leadership, we reason that the i-deals-LMX relationship is affected by the overall value congruence among the group members. Cross-level moderated mediation analyses on multi source data obtained from 289 employees nested in 60 workgroups showed that the mediational role of LMX in the i-deals to performance outcomes relationship was weaker in high value congruence groups.     

Capturing the broader picture of value co-creation management

The interactional, interdependent, and dynamic nature of value co-creation has made value management in business relationships a particularly challenging issue for both academicians and practitioners. In addition, studies on this topic have mostly focused on managing value co-creation in isolation from the wider relational context without completely capturing the influence of other value processes on value co-creation. This paper examines the broader picture of value co-creation management by providing a model based on interlinked value processes, namely, value communication, value appropriation, value measurement, and value representation. We adopted a qualitative approach based on 86 interviews with managers of both customer and supplier companies, which operated in different industries. Results showed that the management of value co-creation implies considering complex patterns of interconnections with other value processes. In particular, the study will shed light on the centrality of value appropriation to co-create value and on the importance of value representation to coordinate ideas and enable future co-creation opportunities.     

孙中山的宪政民主论及其价值

孙中山的宪政民主论是其民权主义政治学说的核心组成部分,在辛亥革命中及此后,起了巨大的推动历史变革的作用,迄今仍有在政治思维上的启示性价值:人民主权学说、直接民权与间接民权相结合思想,以及素朴的民主集中制观念,对于建设有中国特色的社会主义民主政治,有一定的历史借鉴意义.     

论艺术的社会性和审美理想

衡量艺术品质量的重要标准是社会性和审美理想的统一.两者的统一,首先表现为功利性和审美性的统一;其次是"再现"和"表现"的统一,"内容美"和"形式美"的统一;再次是社会性和审美性的统一.     

论和谐社会的道德价值导向

道德价值取向的多元化是当代社会的重要特征,构建和谐社会必须坚持正确的道德价值导向,在多元道德价值取向之间实现合理整合,追求道德价值的和谐一致。社会主义荣辱观是构建和谐社会的基本道德规范,也是构建和谐社会的价值取向,必须不断地建设和谐的道德价值观,促进社会的和谐发展。     

论公司价值的创造

公司价值最大化已经成为公司管理的终极目标,如何实现价值创造便成为公司管理的现实目标。公司战略、公司治理和公司理财对公司价值的三个价值推动要素都有很大的影响,因此,需要融合公司战略、公司治理和公司理财来实现价值创造。     

当代审美文化的主体悖论和主体变奏

本文在分析竟生之美的基础上,以此为扫描我国当代审美文化的工具,提出我国当代审美文化的基本维度是竟生之美。我国当代审美文化的竟生之美因其内在的主体悖论使其历经了从红色崇高、悲剧丑和喜剧荒诞的美态发展过程。这种主体的变奏,是对当代中国社会生活审美的客观反映。竟生之美是审美主体性的本质反映。     

探析宪政合理性

宪政的合理性,主要取决于宪政价值诉求中的合理性。何谓合理,不同国度、不同时代,有不同理解。本文力图通过分析宪政的价值构造内涵,为中国实行合理化宪政提供理论参考。     

伽达默尔的审美意识批判及其启示

伽达默尔对海德格尔的艺术真理学说进行解释学的重构,通过审美意识批判提出理解的真理,并以之作为艺术理论的立足点。伽达默尔指出:康德的审美趣味、席勒的审美王国、哈曼的审美感知、尧斯的审美经验将纯粹的审美意识作为艺术理论的立足点,否弃艺术的作为理解的认识的真理功能,显示了美学对于艺术理论的局限性。伽达默尔的这一批判结果对我国当代文学理论建设和发展极具启迪意义。     

对马克思劳动价值论的再思考

论述了劳动价值论是以马克思经济学为基础的科学。指出正确认识劳动价值论应澄清两种误解 :第一、认为马克思的劳动价值论中“劳动是价值的惟一源泉。”即只有体力劳动才是创造价值的劳动或认为劳动价值论中排除了科技工作者的劳动 ;第二、将马克思的价值论与财富论混同。阐明科技工作同样属于生产商品和价值的生产劳动 ;论证了马克思的价值论与财富论既有统一又有区别。特别指出要结合新的现实 ,深化对社会主义社会劳动和劳动价值论的研究和认识 ,在社会主义市场经济建设中发展马克思的劳动价值论