论非法拘禁罪的行为对象

在我国的司法实践中,就侵犯公民权益的案件而言,似乎只有直接对公民生命和健康造成侵害的犯罪才受到关注,而作为直接保障公民人身自由的非法拘禁罪并未引起人们足够的重视。而正是如此,对非法拘禁罪的研究才更有现实意义。     

论京剧的雅化及其鼎盛

文章论述了京剧在 2 0世纪 30年代达到鼎盛阶段的内外部原因。在其内部原因上 ,作者以其研究古代文学史时所提出的“原生态式的把握方式”来观察这一段京剧史 ,从而对这一段京剧史的发展作了新的勾勒 :艺术块团之形成、相互间的争锋、浮沉以及名号形成的种种情况。在其外部原因上 ,论述了京剧是如何从回应“五四”新文化运动的批评以及如何从向话剧的学习中受益的。 30年代新文化界对于当时京剧的雅化是批判的 ,作者则对此取肯定态度。最后还说明了 ,当京剧出国演出时 ,它的许多曾受“五四”新文化运动批判的特点 ,却受到了国外艺术家的肯定 ,中国的京剧艺术家们也更加开拓了视野 :由此勾勒出京剧发展过程中的一个大的回旋     

L'Intervention Sociologique After Twenty-Five Years: Can It Translate into English?

The sociological intervention is a research method developed in France by Alain Touraine in 1976 to explore social movement action. Since then it has undergone significant development, both in terms of the type of social experience explored and the broader research program framing it. Despite its importance, the intervention remains little known and virtually untested within English-language sociology. This article examines key dimensions of this research method through discussing several examples, and argues that the intervention has much to offer English-language sociologists concerned with questions of agency and reflexivity, relationship, narrative and experience.     

新型村集体经济何以带动乡村共同富裕？——基于ANT视角的分析

促进农村农民的共同富裕是实现全体人民共同富裕的重要内容和难点问题。以山东省代村为例,运用行动者网络理论,解构了新型村集体经济异质行动者网络转译过程,剖析了村集体经济推动村民实现共同富裕的路径。研究发现:新型村集体经济发展推动村民实现共同富裕过程,是以乡村政治精英领导的村“两委”班子为关键人类行动者和土地、房屋等非人类行动者,通过行政征召、专家征召、文化征召等方式推动行动者网络形成与发展,并不断破解村民的异议与矛盾,从而达成利益联盟,构建稳定行动者网络的动态发展过程。以村民利益为核心的集体经济发展思路和村干部说服性治理工作逻辑在矛盾化解、争取村民信任与支持方面发挥了重要作用;绿色高质量发展的新型村集体经济进一步推动了村内民生保障体系建设;通过公平利益分配、文化权益保障等方式实现了村民物质富裕与精神文化富有。     

Agency: The Internal Split of Structure

In this article I first examine the ways in which the dual terms of structure and agency are used in sociological theories. Then, relying on Lacan's notions of split-subject, the formula of sexuation, and forms of discourses, and Laclau's theory of ideological hegemony, I argue that agency in most current sociological formulations is but a posited other of the structure that dissolves if examined closely; it is similar to the Lacanian fantasmic object. To resolve the fundamental paradoxes in structure-agency theories, I reformulate structures as paradoxical, incomplete, and contingent symbolic formations that are always partial and unstable due to their inclusion and exclusion operations. Consequently, social transformational agency consists in the structural inconsistencies that open structural gaps available to social actors. As a result, agency can be recognized in two moments conceived as two symbolic gestures. From this perspective, agency as such is always a possibility qua potential and its efficacy is always retroactively recognized-actualized from within a new social structure or symbolic order.     

宋代滑稽戏与宰相

宋代滑稽戏多有嘲谑宰相的现象,这与宰相的地位职权、戏剧的演出场合以及伶人的讽谏精神有关。谚语"台官不如伶官"的出现,既是台官受制于宰相,不能或不敢行使纠弹权所致,又是伶人依附于皇权并向士大夫靠拢,讽谏精神得到维持并增强的结果。而由于立场、需求不同,皇帝、宰相及其他人对滑稽戏的接受情况各异,对滑稽戏发展的影响也有差别。     

Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnomethodology

Symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology, while apparently similar in topic and approach, are radically different sociological perspectives. Garfinkel's notion of a plenum is used to illustrate this difference with regard to their approaches to the concept of interaction. Ethnomethodology's rejection of the concepts of actor and context, and its different treatment of meaning, are contrasted with symbolic interactionism's terms of reference.     

宗教群体资格简论

通过对中国北京基督新教群体的田野研究,以宗教行动者为核心,可尝试建构宗教(群体)资格的如下假设体系:一、行动者有多重群体资格;二、皈依一种宗教,即主动地追求其宗教群体资格。三、宗教群体资格的识别和觉知,以社会范畴化作为认知基础。四、在社会范畴化的基础上,宗教行动者对其宗教资格的的积极评价,通过社会比较得以强化。五、宗教群体有惯例性和典范性的行为模式,使之不断地激活宗教群体资格的显著性。六、基于灵性资本和世俗资本,宗教徒的宗教生活和世俗生活得以区分。     

The Analysis of the Borders of the Social World: A Challenge for Sociological Theory

ABSTRACT: In order to delimit the realm of social phenomena, sociologists refer implicitly or explicitly to a distinction between living human beings and other entities, that is, sociologists equate the social world with the world of living humans. This consensus has been questioned by only a few authors, such as Luckmann, and some scholars of science studies. According to these approaches, it would be ethnocentric to treat as self-evident the premise that only living human beings can be social actors. The methodological consequence of such critique is a radical deanthropologization of sociological research. It must be considered an open question whether or not only living human can be social actors. The paper starts with a discussion of the methodological problems posed by such an analysis of the borders of the social world, and presents the results of an empirical analysis of these borders in the fields of intensive care and neurological rehabilitation. Within these fields it must be determined whether a body is a living human body or a symbol using human body. The analysis of these elementary border phenomena challenges basic sociological concepts. The relevant contemporary sociological theories refer to a dyadic constellation as the systematic starting point of their concept of sociality. The complex relationship between at least two entities is understood as the basis of the development of a novel order that functions as a mediating structure between the involved parties. Based upon empirical data, I argue that it is necessary to change this foundational assumption. Not the dyad but the triad must be understood as the foundational constellation. This implies a new understanding of the third actor, which is distinct from the concepts developed by Simmel and Berger and Luckmann.     

亚里士多德的自愿性责任理论

虽然亚里士多德没有明确提出“责任”概念,但却是第一个深入思考了现代思想家将其视为道德责任理论的内容。其责任理论以行为者的自愿性为逻辑起点,思考行为者的行为动力因、知识前提等,进而通过强调理性选择对责任主体规定予以深化,最后以服务其美德伦理学的德性品质为旨归,主张人应该为其行为与品质负责。其中,始终贯穿着一条基本原则,即以理性行为者为中心,以自愿性来解释责任。其道德责任理论在许多方面富有启发性。